★
菜单
首页 构建方式 关注列表 技术栈
硬件 芯片芯片对比 服务器与系统网络 内存晶圆代工与封装 散热
设施 数据中心电力 项目云计算与 GPU 算力
智能 AI模型软件 AI产品基准测试 研究论文数据集 概念
生态系统 公司股票 人员时间线 趋势AI 的未来
学习 新闻 数据问答 AI助手
关于 关于我们 方法论 数据与API 免责声明
选项
数据与API

免费只读JSON接口,访问本站缓存数据。

深色模式

引导视图
对芯片、数据中心和模型术语感到陌生?我们在浏览过程中以通俗语言解释关键术语,内置辅助说明,数据内容完全一致。

专业视图
您已熟悉这套体系。这里只呈现数据:简洁、快速、紧凑,无多余说明。这是默认视图。

界面语言
‹ 返回
快速阅读 6 分钟阅读 · ← 全部新闻

Every AI workload is one of two things, and they want different machines, different facilities, even different power deals.

Training: a months-long moonshot

Training a frontier model is one enormous synchronized computation: tens of thousands of accelerators working in lockstep for weeks or months, all of them stalling if one hiccups. It wants maximum interconnect bandwidth (NVLink domains, fat fabrics), sits comfortably in one giant remote campus (latency to users is irrelevant), and tolerates almost no failures — a fault at hour 700 that isn't checkpointed is money on fire. Cost is capitalized: Llama 3.1 405B consumed about 39 million H100-hours (disclosed); frontier runs are estimated in the hundreds of millions of dollars of compute.

Inference: a forever utility

Inference is the opposite shape: millions of small independent requests, every second, forever. It scales horizontally (any number of 8-GPU islands), cares about latency (so it spreads geographically toward users), and its cost is operational — cents per million tokens, paid on every query. Its two phases even stress different resources: reading your prompt (prefill) is compute-bound; generating the answer (decode) is memory-bandwidth-bound. Hardware is now specializing by phase — see Rubin CPX.

The crossover

Through 2023 the buildout story was training clusters. By 2025, with ChatGPT near a billion weekly users and agents multiplying tokens per task, industry consensus put the majority of AI compute on inference — NVIDIA has described inference as the dominant workload driving Blackwell demand, and Google built its Ironwood TPU explicitly for the "age of inference."

Why it matters to everything else here

Reasoning models blurred the line — they spend training-scale compute at answer time. And the economics differ existentially: training costs are a bet repaid (or not) over a model's life; inference margin is the industry's actual business model. When analysts argue about the bubble question, they are mostly arguing about whether inference revenue grows into the training and infrastructure bill this site catalogs.

更多内容 基础

How Modern AI Actually Works 阅读 → How to Read an AI Chip Spec Sheet 阅读 → GPU, TPU, ASIC: What's Actually Different? 阅读 →