★
Menu
Accueil Comment c'est construit Watchlist La pile
Matériel PucesComparer les puces Serveurs & systèmesRéseau MémoireFonderies & Packaging Refroidissement
Infrastructures Data centersAlimentation ProjetsCloud et calcul GPU
Intelligence Modèles IALogiciels Produits IABenchmarks Articles de rechercheJeux de données Concepts
Écosystème EntreprisesActions PersonnesChronologie TendancesAvenir de l'IA
Formation Actualités Interroger les données Agents IA
À propos À propos de nous Méthodologie Données & API Avertissement
Options
DONNÉES & API

Accès JSON gratuit en lecture seule aux données en cache du site.

Mode sombre

Vue guidée
Nouveau dans l'univers des puces, des data centers et du jargon des modèles ? Nous expliquons les termes clés au fil de votre navigation, en langage clair. Les mêmes données, avec l'aide intégrée.

Vue expert
Vous connaissez déjà le sujet. Juste les données : claires, rapides et concises, sans explications superflues. Il s'agit de la vue par défaut.

Langue de l'interface
‹ Retour
Lecture rapide 6 min de lecture · ← Tous les articles explicatifs

Every AI workload is one of two things, and they want different machines, different facilities, even different power deals.

Training: a months-long moonshot

Training a frontier model is one enormous synchronized computation: tens of thousands of accelerators working in lockstep for weeks or months, all of them stalling if one hiccups. It wants maximum interconnect bandwidth (NVLink domains, fat fabrics), sits comfortably in one giant remote campus (latency to users is irrelevant), and tolerates almost no failures — a fault at hour 700 that isn't checkpointed is money on fire. Cost is capitalized: Llama 3.1 405B consumed about 39 million H100-hours (disclosed); frontier runs are estimated in the hundreds of millions of dollars of compute.

Inference: a forever utility

Inference is the opposite shape: millions of small independent requests, every second, forever. It scales horizontally (any number of 8-GPU islands), cares about latency (so it spreads geographically toward users), and its cost is operational — cents per million tokens, paid on every query. Its two phases even stress different resources: reading your prompt (prefill) is compute-bound; generating the answer (decode) is memory-bandwidth-bound. Hardware is now specializing by phase — see Rubin CPX.

The crossover

Through 2023 the buildout story was training clusters. By 2025, with ChatGPT near a billion weekly users and agents multiplying tokens per task, industry consensus put the majority of AI compute on inference — NVIDIA has described inference as the dominant workload driving Blackwell demand, and Google built its Ironwood TPU explicitly for the "age of inference."

Why it matters to everything else here

Reasoning models blurred the line — they spend training-scale compute at answer time. And the economics differ existentially: training costs are a bet repaid (or not) over a model's life; inference margin is the industry's actual business model. When analysts argue about the bubble question, they are mostly arguing about whether inference revenue grows into the training and infrastructure bill this site catalogs.

Plus dans Fondements

How Modern AI Actually Works Lire → How to Read an AI Chip Spec Sheet Lire → GPU, TPU, ASIC: What's Actually Different? Lire →