★
메뉴
홈 구축 방식 관심 목록 스택
하드웨어 칩칩 비교 서버 및 시스템네트워킹 메모리파운드리 및 패키징 냉각
시설 데이터 센터전력 프로젝트클라우드 및 GPU 컴퓨팅
인텔리전스 AI 모델소프트웨어 AI 제품벤치마크 연구 논문데이터셋 개념
생태계 기업주식 인물타임라인 트렌드AI의 미래
학습 뉴스 데이터에 질문하기 AI 에이전트
소개 회사 소개 방법론 데이터 및 API 면책 고지
옵션
데이터 및 API

사이트 캐시 데이터에 대한 무료 읽기 전용 JSON 접근.

다크 모드

가이드 보기
칩, 데이터 센터, 모델 용어가 생소하신가요? 브라우징하면서 핵심 용어를 알기 쉽게 설명해 드립니다. 동일한 데이터에 도움말이 내장되어 있습니다.

전문가 보기
스택은 이미 알고 계시죠. 데이터만 제공합니다: 깔끔하고, 빠르고, 간결하게, 불필요한 설명 없이. 이것이 기본 보기입니다.

인터페이스 언어
‹ 뒤로
심층 분석 7 분 분량 · ← 전체 해설

Since October 2022, the most important product decisions in AI hardware have been made partly in Washington. Here is the machinery of the chip war without the jargon.

What the rules restrict

Three chokeholds, applied in escalating rounds: chips above performance and interconnect thresholds (A100/H100-class, then the A800/H800 workarounds in 2023, with successive thresholds after); tools to make advanced chips — EUV was never exportable to China, and DUV plus service followed via Dutch and Japanese alignment; and people and money — US persons supporting Chinese advanced fabs, HBM sales, and entity-listed firms (Huawei, SMIC and hundreds more). The stated goal: hold China's frontier compute several generations back.

How China adapted

Three visible strategies. Substitution: Huawei's Ascend line on SMIC's EUV-less 7 nm — technically real, economically painful (yield), supported by state purchase mandates. Efficiency: DeepSeek-style engineering that wrings frontier results from constrained hardware — the result that made 'controls are working/failing' a simultaneous headline pair. Openness: exporting influence through open weights (Qwen, GLM, Kimi) when exporting chips is impossible.

How the rules keep moving

Policy has oscillated with administrations and negotiations: 2025 brought both tightening (new entity listings) and selective loosening (H20-class sales resumed under a revenue-sharing arrangement — an unprecedented structure), plus proposals conditioning advanced-chip access on US-alignment (the G42 template). Every record in this database that touches China carries a date for exactly this reason: the rules are a time series, not a fact.

The scorecard debate

Hawks point to China's absent EUV, constrained HBM and CloudMatrix's power-hungry workarounds. Critics point to accelerated substitution, lost US vendor revenue funding rivals' R&D cuts, and diffusion through open weights anyway. Independent analysts split. Our practice: report capability with basis labels, report policy with dates, and link the primary sources — the reader keeps the scorecard.

더 보기 산업 및 미래

The Full Supply Chain, Sand to Intelligence 읽기 → The Listed AI-Infrastructure Universe 읽기 → 2030 and Beyond: Scenarios, Not Prophecies 읽기 →