★
Menu
Home How It's Built Watchlist The Stack
Hardware ChipsCompare Chips Servers & SystemsNetworking MemoryFoundries & Packaging Cooling
Facilities Data CentersPower ProjectsCloud & GPU Compute
Intelligence AI ModelsSoftware AI ProductsBenchmarks Research PapersDatasets Concepts
Ecosystem CompaniesStocks PeopleTimeline TrendsFuture of AI
Learn News Ask the Data AI Agents
About About us Methodology Data & API Disclaimer
Options
DATA & API

Free read-only JSON access to the site's cached data.

Dark mode

Guided View
New to chips, data centers and model jargon? We explain key terms as you browse, in plain English. Same data, with the help built in.

Expert View
You already know the stack. Just the data: clean, fast and compact, with no extra explanations. This is the default view.

Interface language
‹ Back
Deep dive 7 min read · ← All explainers

Since October 2022, the most important product decisions in AI hardware have been made partly in Washington. Here is the machinery of the chip war without the jargon.

What the rules restrict

Three chokeholds, applied in escalating rounds: chips above performance and interconnect thresholds (A100/H100-class, then the A800/H800 workarounds in 2023, with successive thresholds after); tools to make advanced chips — EUV was never exportable to China, and DUV plus service followed via Dutch and Japanese alignment; and people and money — US persons supporting Chinese advanced fabs, HBM sales, and entity-listed firms (Huawei, SMIC and hundreds more). The stated goal: hold China's frontier compute several generations back.

How China adapted

Three visible strategies. Substitution: Huawei's Ascend line on SMIC's EUV-less 7 nm — technically real, economically painful (yield), supported by state purchase mandates. Efficiency: DeepSeek-style engineering that wrings frontier results from constrained hardware — the result that made 'controls are working/failing' a simultaneous headline pair. Openness: exporting influence through open weights (Qwen, GLM, Kimi) when exporting chips is impossible.

How the rules keep moving

Policy has oscillated with administrations and negotiations: 2025 brought both tightening (new entity listings) and selective loosening (H20-class sales resumed under a revenue-sharing arrangement — an unprecedented structure), plus proposals conditioning advanced-chip access on US-alignment (the G42 template). Every record in this database that touches China carries a date for exactly this reason: the rules are a time series, not a fact.

The scorecard debate

Hawks point to China's absent EUV, constrained HBM and CloudMatrix's power-hungry workarounds. Critics point to accelerated substitution, lost US vendor revenue funding rivals' R&D cuts, and diffusion through open weights anyway. Independent analysts split. Our practice: report capability with basis labels, report policy with dates, and link the primary sources — the reader keeps the scorecard.

More in Industry & Futures

The Full Supply Chain, Sand to Intelligence Read → The Listed AI-Infrastructure Universe Read → 2030 and Beyond: Scenarios, Not Prophecies Read →