★
Menü
Startseite So wird es gebaut Watchlist Der Stack
Hardware ChipsChips vergleichen Server & SystemeNetzwerk ArbeitsspeicherFoundries & Packaging Kühlung
Anlagen RechenzentrenStrom ProjekteCloud & GPU-Computing
Intelligenz KI-ModelleSoftware KI-ProdukteBenchmarks ForschungspapiereDatensätze Konzepte
Ökosystem UnternehmenAktien PersonenTimeline TrendsZukunft der KI
Lernen Nachrichten Daten befragen KI-Agenten
Über Über uns Methodik Daten & API Haftungsausschluss
Optionen
DATEN & API

Kostenloser, lesender JSON-Zugriff auf die zwischengespeicherten Daten der Website.

Dunkelmodus

Geführte Ansicht
Neu bei Chips, Rechenzentren und Modell-Fachbegriffen? Wir erklären wichtige Begriffe beim Stöbern in verständlicher Sprache. Dieselben Daten, mit integrierter Hilfe.

Expertenansicht
Sie kennen die Materie bereits. Nur die Daten: übersichtlich, schnell und kompakt, ohne zusätzliche Erklärungen. Das ist die Standardansicht.

Oberflächensprache
‹ Zurück
Deep Dive 8 Min. Lesezeit · ← Alle Neuigkeiten

Mark this page's rule: every claim below is attributed and conditional. The future section of a database earns trust by labeling speculation, not avoiding it. See also Future and AGI timelines.

What is roughly knowable to 2027

Hardware roadmaps are public commitments: Rubin and MI400 in 2026, Rubin Ultra's ~600 kW racks targeted 2027, HBM4 ramping, N2/18A silicon underneath. Announced campuses (Hyperion, Stargate sites, Fairwater replication) carry 2026–28 phase dates. The capex disclosures fund through at least 2026. Short of shock, the 2027 stack is largely ordered already.

The 2030 scenario fork

Scenario A — scaling holds (the labs' own base case: Altman, Amodei, Hassabis in their published remarks): reasoning + agents keep converting compute into capability; data-center electricity lands near the IEA base case (~945 TWh); gigawatt campuses become routine; first SMRs connect (~2030 targets); AI-designed chips and automated research begin compounding. In this world today's buildout looks conservative.

Scenario B — returns flatten (the skeptics' case: LeCun on architecture limits, Marcus on reliability, the bubble analysts on economics): pre-training gains stall, agents plateau at partial reliability, revenue " "disappoints the depreciation schedule; capex corrects the way telecom's did in 2001 — leaving, as fiber did, cheap abundant compute for the next cycle. Falsifiable markers: hyperscaler capex guidance cuts, GPU lease rates collapsing, model-release cadence slowing.

Scenario C — efficiency inversion (the DeepSeek lesson generalized): capability per dollar improves so fast that intelligence commoditizes; value migrates from training compute to distribution and integration; power demand undershoots every forecast. Markers: open models within months of frontier, token prices falling faster than volumes rise.

Wildcards with real probability mass

Taiwan (the single point of failure every scenario shares), policy ruptures (export regimes, energy politics), a safety incident that changes deployment law, and architecture surprise (world models, post-transformer designs) — each rewrites the map faster than any trend line.

How this site will keep score

We date every record, label every basis, and keep the timeline current. When 2030 arrives, the right way to have been wrong is legibly — that is what a database owes its readers that a prediction never can.

Mehr in Branche & Zukunft

The Full Supply Chain, Sand to Intelligence Lesen → The Listed AI-Infrastructure Universe Lesen → The Chip War, in Plain English Lesen →