★
Menu
Home Come viene costruito Watchlist Lo stack
Hardware ChipConfronta chip Server e sistemiNetworking MemoriaFonderie e packaging Raffreddamento
Strutture Data centerEnergia ProgettiCloud e calcolo GPU
Intelligenza Modelli AISoftware Prodotti AIBenchmark Articoli di ricercaDataset Concetti
Ecosistema AziendeAzioni PersoneTimeline TendenzeFuturo dell'IA
Formazione Notizie Interroga i dati Agenti IA
Info Chi siamo Metodologia Dati & API Avvertenza
Opzioni
DATI & API

Accesso JSON gratuito in sola lettura ai dati in cache del sito.

Modalità scura

Vista guidata
Nuovo al gergo di chip, data center e modelli? Spieghiamo i termini chiave mentre navighi, in modo chiaro e accessibile. Gli stessi dati, con il supporto integrato.

Vista esperto
Conosci già il settore. Solo i dati: chiari, rapidi e compatti, senza spiegazioni aggiuntive. Questa è la visualizzazione predefinita.

Lingua dell'interfaccia
‹ Indietro
Lettura rapida 6 min di lettura · ← Tutti gli explainer

Between your Enter key and the first word back, a small factory runs. Serving engineers call the two phases prefill and decode, and the distinction organizes the entire inference industry.

Prefill: read everything at once

The model ingests your whole prompt in parallel — one big matrix pass, compute-bound, the GPU briefly saturated. Long contexts make this expensive: a 100K-token prompt is real work before any answer exists (hence prefill-specialist hardware like Rubin CPX). Prefill produces the first token and, as a by-product, the KV cache — stored attention state for every prompt token.

Decode: one token at a time

Generation is sequential: predict a token, append, repeat. Each step must stream the model's active weights from HBM, so decode is memory-bandwidth-bound — the GPU's compute units mostly wait. This is why bandwidth headlines every spec sheet and why the KV cache matters: it grows with context length and batch size until memory, not compute, caps how many users a GPU serves.

The tricks that make it affordable

Continuous batching — dozens of conversations share each weight-streaming pass (vLLM's PagedAttention made the memory bookkeeping efficient; SGLang adds prefix reuse). Quantization — FP8/FP4 weights halve and re-halve the bytes per token. Speculative decoding — a small draft model guesses several tokens, the big model verifies in one pass. Disaggregation — separate prefill and decode fleets (NVIDIA Dynamo, DeepSeek's serving stack) so each phase gets the hardware it wants. Together these took open-model serving costs down orders of magnitude in three years.

Reasoning changed the bill

Thinking models generate thousands of hidden tokens before answering — decode-heavy, cache-hungry, exactly the expensive phase. The 'age of inference' buildout (Ironwood, B300's 288 GB, the memory arms race) is downstream of this one product decision: models that think.

Altro in Modelli e software

How a Frontier Model Gets Trained Leggi → The CUDA Moat, Explained Leggi → Open vs Closed: The War Over Weights Leggi → Reasoning Models and the Test-Time Era Leggi →